writing tools

There are a few tools I have used intermittently in writing this blog.

One of them is Grammarly, which is an online grammar checker. I have used it off and on, but have for the most part been unhappy with the advice it has given me. A year ago my subscription was up but they offered me an attractive price so I renewed. I used it very little in the past year. I was not aware that I was on auto-renew, so I was annoyed when a renewal charge hit my credit card recently. Before writing to complain I decided to give it another try, since it had been a while since I had used it.

I used it on a few blog entries and I was not pleased with the results. While it did catch a couple things, a lot of the advice was either wrong for the context or just plain wrong. Grammarly also has a habit of telling me to add commas. I need to delete commas from my writing, not add more.

I have to give the good folks at Grammarly credit, however. I explained the circumstances and they have cancelled my account and reversed the charge on my credit card.

The second is the Writer’s Diet Test. This one is my favorite. The philosophy of the Writer’s Diet is very much in alignment with mine: that all other things being equal, lean is better. It measures for verbs (forms of to be), nouns, adjectives/adverbs, and waste words (it, this, that, there). It measures on a scale from “lean” to “heart attack territory,” with “fit and trim,” “needs toning,” and “flabby” in between.

I really like this tool, and it has helped me to improve some of my blog entries. At the same time, it can be aggravating. Sometimes I’m writing about something that just is, and I am explaining about what it is and what it does. In such cases, to replace forms of to be with other verbs is to risk sounding affected and pretentious. While useful, it is not perfect.

A third tool is the Online Consistency Checker. It exists to promote the products developed by Intelligent Editing, but it is a nice little accessory. It reads a Word document and checks for things like spelling variation and consistency in hyphenation.

Ultimately, of course, there is no substitute for carefully re-reading your own work. Or better yet, enlisting an editor. I know I could use one. As Tahoe Mom has said, “Everyone needs an editor.”


3 Comments on “writing tools”

  1. Tahoe Mom says:

    😀 After having read your blog, I read mine again for the umpteenth time today given its subject matter, only to discover I had mentioned my “lithe” car instead of my little car. *sigh* What must people think who have read it – and I know people have because they have commented. So I will say it again, “Everybody needs an editor.”

    • Of course it’s when the word is spelled correctly and so is not caught by the spell checker that we get tripped up. In my case I missed “lithe” because I was intent on seeing that you got to the ob-gyn’s office and then to the hospital. But, yes, there is simply no substitute for another pair of eyes.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s